patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Why we are voting NO on T-SPLOST

'We are not intrinsically against sales tax, but we don’t believe this particular plan gives enough back to our neighborhood.'

 

by Lee Jessen

My husband, Peter, and I are very much opposed to this bill. We carefully researched the websites, t-splost.com and www.atlantaregionalroundtable.com, looking at each project. What we found was that very little is planned within the city. Here are a few of our points:

  • First of all, I am against this bill because I believe it doesn’t give enough benefit to lower income areas of Atlanta. It is being presented as the only option and our neighborhood doesn’t get anything from it – no Beltline investments, no road improvements, no Moreland Avenue changes, etc. Is it because most residents in our Southside neighborhoods are not affluent or influential?
  • This bill provides that 85 percent of the tax raised in one area can be spent outside that region.

Here is how it is worded:

How will the money be used?

All funds generated through the 2012 TSPLOST would stay in the region in which they were raised and be distributed in two ways:

  • 75 percent would go to the regional projects on the approved list (85 percent in metro Atlanta) — many of which have been on the drawing boards for years but lacked the funding to go forward.
  • 25 percent (15 percent in metro Atlanta) would be returned to the region to be used for local projects chosen by city and county officials. Cities and counties will receive these extra funds in direct proportion to their population and the number of road miles in their jurisdiction.

So, of 100 percent collected in metro Atlanta, 85 percent of that money will go to approved projects anywhere in the 10-county region? Fifteen percent will be used for local projects. An 85/15 percent split in favor of the overall region is not to our advantage and why is Atlanta only getting 15 percent when other areas receive 25 percent? The City of Atlanta raises a significant amount of
sales tax (sports and university events, tourists, conferences, festivals, etc) that will be spent in outlying areas. The metro area bears the burden of infrastructure for visitors and commuters, but is not allowed to use all of the sales tax generated from these metro events.

  • Atlanta is specifically mentioned and other areas get 25% back, why is Atlanta singled out to receive a lower percentage, especially considering how much of this revenue is generated through our resources, such as sports events, tourism, festivals, theatre, etc.?
  • There is no long-term plan for maintenance of the new infrastructure. We are in a time of economic decline and it is not the time to build new roads and MARTA infrastructure to be maintained when we don't know where that future maintenance money is coming from. It’s like you losing your job, and then putting in a pool that you can’t afford to maintain.
  • I also resent that there are penalties for any region that does not vote “yes” to the bill. Here is the quote from t-splost.com: “Regions where the voters do not approve the transportation tax will not receive the additional funds to pay for proposed projects in their area of their state.” This, to me, is political blackmail presenting the threat of penalties for anyone not voting in favor of this particular transportation tax bill. In my opinion, this should be illegal.
  • This is a regressive tax that puts a harder tax burden on the poorest people – all food, drugs, everything is taxed. It is a harder tax burden on our lowest income neighbors. This proposed tax increase will be the single largest tax increase in Georgia’s history. Nothing purchased in a retail setting is exempt from this one percent tax increase. Food, clothing, gasoline... everything. Even the grocery items currently exempt from sales tax will incur this tax. We are not intrinsically against sales tax, but we don’t believe this particular plan gives enough back to our neighborhood.
  • We believe that a gas tax, instead, would be more appropriate since it would rightly tax the people using the roads the most. A more fair solution for road work funding would be to increase fuel taxes and/or road use fees. Taxing gasoline and diesel fuel draws a direct connection between cost and use of roads.
  • Because fuel tax increases and road use fees are unpopular, elected officials won’t consider this option unless we deny them the additional one percent sales tax and force them to think again. This sales tax imposes an unfair burden of those of us who have found a way to drive less. Conservation is the way to reduce air pollution and lessen gridlock.
  • City of Atlanta residents already pay an extra one percent sales tax to separate and repair its old sewers and storm drains. It is just too much to ask us to pay more in sales tax so commuters can have an easier time of it. Let the commuters pay for their own roads.
  • We don't believe it will significantly create jobs or provide “multiplier effect” economic benefits for the City of Atlanta. We also don’t believe that the proposed changes will make any difference in downtown connector traffic congestion.
  • During the economic hardships that are leading to record home foreclosures, we don’t see how we can ask everyone to willingly increase their tax load. The average expected tax increase will be $300 per household. To some individuals and families, this will present a significant hardship. And if you’ve lived in Georgia for long, you know that once a tax is instated, we pay it forever.


I was in the grocery store recently and saw an elderly man shaking his head saying "My, oh, my" I asked him if I could help and he said "The price of peanut butter has gone up so much! I can't afford it anymore" And it made me sad to think that a bill like this increases the cost of a jar of peanut butter a minimum of an extra 6 cents (not counting the reverberating effect of increased sales taxes). HE is the one who is really hurt by increases like this and HE doesn't get any benefit in this area of town, especially if he can't drive a car. I think we can all agree that food prices are going up due to drought and our cost of money is set to increase, both things which really hit the lower to middle class. This is not the economic time for a bill like this. Let's instead think about how we are going to maintain what we have.

For more information, please read the Sierra Club article “Why Voters Should Say No to the T-SPLOST”. They make many points, including political issues relating to the governance and control of this money. They also make the point that “the road funding neglects maintenance and needs to focus on new capacity, with five times as much funding going to expanded capacity than to maintenance and operations, further compounding an already serious backlog
of asset management needs”. Here is the Sierra Club article URL: http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageNavigator/20120430_TSPLOST.html

Other websites with t-splost opinions: http://tsplost.com/ or http://www.citystink.net/2012/06/15-reasons-to-detest-t-splost-and.html

Our basic take on it is "no" to an additional sales tax on everything anyone buys and "yes" to an additional excise tax on gasoline, diesel fuel and toll/road fees. Place the tax more directly onthose who benefit most from the expanded road infrastructure.

Please join us in voting “no” on July 31st.

Ms. Jessen, of Ormewood Park, is a CPA.

Related Topics: T-SPLOST and Transportation

Chris H

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The Atlanta Streetcar (Auburn Avenue trolley as you call it) has absolutely nothing to do with the T-SPLOST. Totally FALSE. Funding for this was put up partially by the City of Atlanta and a Tiger II grant from the Federal Government which was completed last year. Also, funding for maintenance and operations will be funded by fares, hotel tax and rental car tax.

You say that Beltline plans have dropped in Ormewood Park, but they do not own that right of way of the Beltline because it's still an active rail line owned by the LaFarge concert company in Glenwood Park. They are up for selling it, but until then the Beltline can do nothing on that park of the railway.
http://aisforatlanta.com/2011/02/lafarge-ready-to-leave-beltline/

Also, the next section of the Beltline trail scheduled to be worked on after completion of the Eastside trails in the section through Reynoldstown to Glenwood Park which will come up to your neighborhood.

This is only the beginning of the false statements you have here. I'll come back and prove even more of your statements here false with cold hard facts when I have more time...

Reply

Don Broussard

1:17 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Our region really does need more investment in transportation. But the sales tax would apply to every gallon of milk you buy at the grocery — but not to a gallon of diesel fuel bought by trucking companies that use (and clog) our highways. This tax literally gives the trucking industry a free ride on Georgia highways. Most of the projects are NOT regional projects. Look at the $25 million project to "improve" (that means widen) North Druid Hills Road by adding a median. This project clearly meets the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" test. (Needed improvements at NoDH – Briarcliff intersection are already underway). Example two: the light rail line to Clifton Corridor / Emory. Its $700 million price tag gets light rail only as far as Emory University, a religious-affiliated institution that pays no property taxes and no sales taxes. The line would not extend to North DeKalb Medical Center which is the objective in MARTA's plan. Emory and the CDC (again, a federal facility and therefore exempt from local taxes) benefit directly from this line but pay nothing. Plus, according to the project fact sheet, construction would not even begin until 2020! For Clifton Corridor workers who commute from Stone Mountain / east Gwinnett and southeast DeKalb, this rail line from Lindbergh does nothing to help them. As a professional city planner, I cannot vote for this.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patch

6:59 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

we pay for it either way. Those trucks are delivering goods for me and you... you raise the gas tax then you can expect the cost to be passed on to us.

Comment_arrow

Patch

6:59 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

My god.. Emory is loosely religiously affiliated at best. + the CDC is on campus. If you want to tax Emory then tax all religious affiliations, which I support because of all the people that make tax-free money in the name of religion. Emory is not next to any freeway and has the mass of people that makes transit feasible. Emory is still adding on during this recession. They are clearly a job creator, and we need to support them.

betty

1:17 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

thanks so much for posting this. i've been on the fence and needing some research! i'll check the links. :)

Reply

JasonInGP

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

You're right about a lot - but, also wrong on some parts.

"The tourist trolley down Auburn Avenue" isn't part of the TSPLOST.

I believe you have misinterpreted the whole 85/15 thing. The Clifton Corridor MARTA extension and the Beltline are part of the 85, not the 15.

Reply

Chris H

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The Atlanta Streetcar (Auburn Avenue trolley as you call it) has absolutely nothing to do with the T-SPLOST. Totally FALSE. Funding for this was put up partially by the City of Atlanta and a Tiger II grant from the Federal Government which was completed last year. Also, funding for maintenance and operations will be funded by fares, hotel tax and rental car tax.

You say that Beltline plans have dropped in Ormewood Park, but they do not own that right of way of the Beltline because it's still an active rail line owned by the LaFarge concert company in Glenwood Park. They are up for selling it, but until then the Beltline can do nothing on that park of the railway.
http://aisforatlanta.com/2011/02/lafarge-ready-to-leave-beltline/

Also, the next section of the Beltline trail scheduled to be worked on after completion of the Eastside trails in the section through Reynoldstown to Glenwood Park which will come up to your neighborhood.

Reply

Kevin Erwin

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

I'm not sure how the editorial process works at East Atlanta Patch, but there are quite a few things in this piece that are either misleading or flat-out wrong, enought that this article really should be either fact checked or pulled down. For example, the Atlanta Streetcar is not one of the T-SPLOST projects and other projects actually on the project list are incorrectly described as being paid for out of the 15% local funds component (e.g., the Emory MARTA extension and the Beltline).

Reply

JasonInGP

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

What happened to my comment?

Reply

James McConnell

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

"I also resent that there are penalties for any region that does not vote “yes” to the bill. Here is the quote from t-splost.com: “Regions where the voters do not approve the transportation tax will not receive the additional funds to pay for proposed projects in their area of their state.” This, to me, is political blackmail presenting the threat of penalties for anyone not voting in favor of this particular transportation tax bill. In my opinion, this should be illegal." That's fucking ridiculous. It's only saying that if your county doesn't approve the Tsplost then they don't get funding. That's they same way Marta was founded in the seventies. By this person's logic, Fulton and Dekalb should have paid for bus service to Cobb and Gwinnett, who voted down the plan, for the last 35 years.

Reply

James McConnell

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

‎'We are not intrinsically against sales tax, but we don’t believe this particular plan gives enough back to our neighborhood.' This statement is fucked up for two reasons. One, she is intrinsically against sales tax as she clearly states in her last four points. Second, saying it doesn't specifically reach one area over another is so mind-bogglingly self centered. I don't spend anytime in Bankhead but that doesn't mean I'm opposed to Marta running there. I could give two shits about road widening in Douglas County, but I do see how road improvements benefit them as much as transit infrastructure benefits me in the city proper.

Reply

James McConnell

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

We can't expect to suddenly have a series of commuter lines running to all the burbs. We have to begin creating infrastructure here so that we can get future federal funding to build up the city and move forward. No one will ever be happy with just roads or just transit and in order to get either of those we need to compromise.

Reply

Andrea K-s

1:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The 15% vs. 25% isn't up to the local region. It's in the definitions used in the TSPLOST authorizing legislation - municipalities that cross county boundaries get 25%. I don't know which cities in Georgia crosses county lines, but assume it was written this way to scratch their backs - whoever they are.

And that highlights the core problem with this article and with the position taken by the Sierra Club. Any solution must be passed by the Georgia General Assembly. I agree wholeheartedly that there are better ways to fund transportation. But they will *never* pass a solution that uses an increase in progressive income tax or increases gas taxes. And Republicans will be in power for Georgia for many many years to come.

For progressives considering voting against TSPLOST, Atlanta's projects will benefit low income areas including better bus or rail service for south Dekalb and massive increases in transit for densely populated low income west Atlanta. TSPLOST won't impact food stamp grocery purchases, which the elderly man in the grocery store probably qualifies for as do most low income Atlantans.

Reply

Don Broussard

2:12 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Andrea, I'm not buying your argument -- which is little more than this: "we are hostages of the Republican General Assembly so lets be happy with the bread crumbs they give us". And your statement that the "elderly and most low-income Atlantans" qualify for food stamps is factually wrong, insulting, and delusional. The sales tax you so eagerly want will screw over low-income and middle class alike. You are obviously no "progressive".

Reply

SEARCHJOBS AT SEARCH50.NET

4:21 am on Thursday, August 2, 2012

Closing of major projects can be a major decline in jobs
http://www.search50.net

Reply

Leave a comment