patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Rally Planned to Oppose Glenwood Place Project

Compliance with BeltLine Overlay District, traffic and environmental impact among cited concerns.

 

by Patch Staff

On Monday, Oct. 29, 2012, residents of Glenwood Park, Grant Park, Ormewood Park, East Atlanta and other surrounding neighborhoods will attend a rally to express their concerns about Fuqua Development's planned "Glenwood Place" project and its decision to include a 155,000-square-foot, big box retailer as an anchor tenant in a new urban development neighborhood that was specifically created to reduce traffic and increase walkability.

Objections to the planned development at 800 Glenwood Ave. include but are not limited to failure to comply with the BeltLine Overlay District, the potential for excessive traffic on residential two-lane roads and the potential adverse environmental impact.

The rally is scheduled for 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. in Brasfield Square at 933 Garrett St. in Glenwood Park.

See also:

NPUs Give Their Support in Opposition to Glenwood Place Project

NPU-W Opposes Glenwood Place Development

Online Petition To Stop Glenwood Place Project in Grant Park

Walmart: Do You Love Them or Hate Them?

Major Retail Planned at Glenwood

Related Topics: Fuqua Development, Glenwood Place, and Grant Park

J. H.

8:33 am on Friday, October 26, 2012

I think the idea of a rally is at this point kind of silly. They don't even have a tenant in mind yet. While I'm not in favor of a walmart supercenter an urban type store would be fine with me or a movie theater. It seems that their is always a small group of loud people that do not want any developement at all. Zero. I would remind you that we need jobs too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anjin-san

11:10 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Spot-on with this statement, JH:

"...always a small group of loud people that do not want any developement at all. Zero."

We should just re-name our area NIMBYville. In 10-20 years Patch will be doing stories of why the movie industry films post-apocalyptic zombie movies in Southeast Atlanta, and the answer will be because the local citizens couldn't agree how to re-develop all of the former industrial-commercial properties (which look like 3rd-world rubble/graffiti training grounds) which we have in abundance.

Comment_arrow

Anjin-san

11:16 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

And it usually is a small group of people...Just go to any Land Use & Zoning, Neighborhood Association meeting, or NPU meeting for confirmation.

There is definitely truth to Sorkin's "Decisions are made by those who show up."

Comment_arrow

JasonInGP

12:21 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I think you guys are way off base here.

I haven't heard a single person say "zero development." If anything, pretty much everyone I've heard or read has similar, if not exactly the same, opinions to J.H.

Are you suggesting that no one should say anything? Let developers build anything they want with zero community input/involvment?

Anjin, help me out here - I can't recall a single development proposed for a former industrial site in SE Atlanta that's been stopped by the community. Which one(s) are you talking about?

TD

9:40 am on Friday, October 26, 2012

With all due respect to J.H., this is more than a few people. Regardless of rally attendence numbers the development plan is lacking, the point of opposition isn't to stop all development and frankly, the creation of low paying jobs, the purpose is to enforce compliance with previously approved land use rules and to ensure that the area surrounding any development is not negatively impacted by whatever is developed. Given WM's labor practices it is easy to see why there's opposition to even the possibility of their box in our backyard but there are many other issues regardless of the actual tenant that need to be addressed before the development plan could gain support from the surrounding communities. That notwithstanding, Fuqua builds WM's almost exclusively when he develops retail (with few exceptions), the possibility of anything other than WM is betrayed by the current plan - how many Whole Food's are there with a dedicated garden center? The tax base concentration in OP, GP, EA and GWP has the responsibility to ensure responsible development. See you at the Rally!

Reply

K.C

12:04 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Does anyone know details about the rally? Are there going to be decision makers or city personnel there to listen to our concerns? A rally is a great idea if there's someone there to listen to what we have to say.

Reply

AM

2:55 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Does anyone have the plan for what tenants are being considered?

Reply

Dan G

10:16 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

If a big box is going to go in there, how about Costco? Their employment practices are very much acceptable and they're a high quality business.

I don't live down there but I'd like to eventually. I have friends in GP & IP. Is there a Costco in area? Good luck.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Murphy

11:50 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Once again, it is not the specific tenants that are objectionable, it is the size of the proposed development that is the problem: it is serviced by two-lane surface streets, and across from the (soon-to-be) new high school.

No, Fuqua has no tenants- nor does he own the property. We in the surrounding neighborhoods are trying to get ahead of the development schedule, and using PR and official neighborhood org.'s, affect the prospective tenants, put City land-use bureaucrats on notice and alert all affected and interested citizens.

Leave a comment