patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

NPU-W Opposes Glenwood Place Development

Neighborhood group, which says the Fuqua Development's planned 199,050-square-foot retail project at Glenwood Avenue and Bill Kennedy Way is a 'direct contravention of the BeltLine Masterplan as well as the BeltLine Overlay District regulations.'

 

Neighborhood Planning Unit-W, which represents the interests of several southeast Atlanta communties, including Grant Park, Ormewood Park and East Atlanta, opposes the planned retail project at 800 Glenwood Ave., which aims to bring 199,050 square feet of retail — including an anchor tenant that would take 155,000 square feet — to Grant Park.

NPU-W, which is seeking the support of its sister NPUs across the city, says Fuqua Development's Glenwood Place project contradicts and violates development guidelines outlined in the Atlanta BeltLine Masterplan.

NPU-W's push joins that of some residents in Ormewood Park, Grant Park and Glenwood Park who are pushing an online petition urging the city to block the project.

Edward Gilgor, NPU-W's chairman and East Atlanta resident, shared the letter of support request to the other NPUs as well as the letter sent to the City of Atlanta Office of Planning with East Atlanta Patch:

NPU-W is seeking the support for its opposition to SAP Application No. BL-12-035, in which Fuqua Development is attempting to foist a cookie cutter suburban model on an urban neighborhood in direct contravention of the BeltLine Masterplan as well as the BeltLine Overlay District regulations.

NPU-W encourages all NPUs to review NPU-W's comments on this application, and if they are so inclined, to convey their support for NPU-W's position to the Office of Planning (cjacks@atlantaga.gov) as well as the City Council (*CityCouncilMembers@AtlantaGa.Gov) and its staff (*CityCouncilStaff@AtlantaGa.Gov).

I appreciate all who take the time and effort to consider NPU-W's request.
Thank you.

NPU-W's response to the application, as well as the application itself and various supporting documents, can be found at: https://docs.google.com/folder/d/0BzhPwP7Vp7L6YTFkYzljY3VPTUk/edit

Below, I have excerpted the conclusion from NPU-W's Response:

NPU-W opposes the plan as presented in the Special Administrative Permit Application. As demonstrated in more detail above, the plan fails, in many particulars, to account for the application of the BeltLine Overlay or for the Subarea 4 Master Plan for the BeltLine as adopted by the Council in 2011.

The specific requests sought by the application do not comport with existing limitations. The proposal seems conveniently to ignore zoning restrictions when it interferes with the goal of the project. There is no request to exceed the number of curb cuts along Glenwood when the application seeks to exceed the width of allowed curb cuts. The proposal indicates the inclusion of only 2.5” caliper street side trees when zoning clearly requires 3” caliper trees. Furthermore, the application seeks to install and allow street side loading and unloading (citing Ordinance Section 16.28.015), while ignoring the directly applicable section of the BeltLine Overlay, 16-36.016.2. This kind of aggressive ignorance is indicative not of an enlightened view of new urbanism, but rather a rather common and pervasive view of old-style suburbanism.

The introduction of this purely retail focused plan does not further the goals of the BeltLine to provide residential focus in areas designated as BeltLine stops. It is also contrary to the developer’s own statements that its “concepts incorporate characteristics of ‘live, work, play’ into communities and integrate urban lifestyles with shopping center environments.” Nothing about the proposal integrates this retail development into the existing community nor does it provide a means of integrating new residential into the retail development.

More fundamentally, the proposal fails in nearly every way to comply with the goals and ideals adopted by Council in committing to the construction of the Atlanta BeltLine and Council’s bold vision of connecting and revitalizing Atlanta. Instead, the proposal seeks to wedge a typically suburban big box store into historic neighborhoods and communities that have strived for true intersection of the live, work play ideal represented by new urbanism. NPU-W urges the Office of Planning to exercise its discretion and deny the application as it had been submitted. Should the applicant decide to submit an application that does meet with the BeltLine Overlay and the Subarea 4 Master Plan, then it will find the surrounding communities, as well as this NPU, to be active partners and supporters in its endeavor.

NPU-W thanks the Office of Planning for taking the time to review this application.

— Edward Gilgor,

Chairman, NPU-W

See also:

Online Petition To Stop Glenwood Place Project in Grant Park

Walmart: Do You Love Them or Hate Them?

Major Retail Planned at Glenwood

Related Topics: Fuqua Develpment, Glenwood Place, Grant Park, and Redevelopement

J. H.

7:54 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

Is this petition just an excuse to stop a possible walmart store? Exactly what kind of retail will be put in? I need more information before I sign a petition to stop all retail. Fuqua needs to be more open but so do the petitioners.

Reply

Starr Anderson

8:35 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

Seems like a scaled down version with a Trader Joe's or Fresh Market as the anchor would be more appropriate for the area. My neighbors reaction to a Walmart
there is overwhelmingly negative.

Reply

JasonInGP

10:05 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012

I think a scaled down anything would get a better reaction - even a WalMart (gasp!). The massive parking lot and auto-centric nature of Fuqua's proposal, IMO, is what most people object to.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Murphy

8:45 am on Sunday, October 21, 2012

@Jason: that is correct. It is the massive scale- 200,000 sq. ft of retail, over 1,000 parking spaces, a projected 10,000 car trips per day- that has been the concern, all at the intersection of two, two-lane roads and a 'no-return' interstate exit. Plus, the high school- undergoing a $40 million renovation- is right across the street.

Alyn Smith

12:45 am on Monday, October 22, 2012

Good luck on fighting Fuqua. In Denver, we succeeded in getting Fuqua to take Walmart out of the development mix and got the mayor to agree to work with us on zoning that was conducive to the neighborhood. Fuqua is someone you really can't trust.

Reply

Mary Ann Keon

9:48 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

I don't know why we oppose development such as this. When you look at what was done at the Edgewood shopping center with the many big box stores and local retailers, I would call it a success. Traffic is manageable and it has enhanced the whole area and become the go to place for shopping for most of us. I also have nothing against Wal Mart and don't understand the prejudice there. They have great value and have proven to be a strong force for sustainability. I would love to have more real shopping, day to day stuff, closer to Grant Park.

Reply

Leave a comment