patching...
Breaking: Man Shot Dead in East Atlanta Robbery — Gunmen at Large »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Zoning Board Denies QuikTrip Site Appeal

'Skanky store' remains for now

 

The Atlanta Zoning Board of Review on Thursday denied an appeal by an Ormewood Park landowner to an earlier city ruling that, if reversed, would have paved the way for construction of a QuikTrip convenience store and gas station.

The ZBR's decision to uphold the city's ruling — by a vote of 4 to 0 — brings to a close a long standing battle between residents of Ormewood Park and Gobind L. Madan, who owns the rundown Jiffy Grocery store on the northwest corner of Moreland and Ormewood avenues.

"We are pleased with the board's decision and think it was the correct outcome," said Ron Lall, board chairman of the SouthStar Community Development Corp., which advocates for several communities along the Moreland Avenue corridor in commercial and residential development.

Madan, an accountant who also owns the Liberty Tax Service that fronts Ormewood Avenue and sits behind the grocery store, wanted to overturn the city planning department's denial of his request to split the land into two separate parcels.

Initially, the city approved his application to replat the property, meaning he could split it into two separate commercial tracts.

That was key to QuikTrip Corp.'s project, because city ordinances forbid gas stations from being within 100 feet of adjacent, single-family homes.

But in a letter dated May 25, Charletta Wilson Jacks, director of the city's planning office, wrote the decision to split the commercial lot into two separate parcels had to be reversed because it violated city regulations regarding street frontages.

Madan's attorney, Robert Raleigh, asked the board for a deferral, saying Madan was out of town. Raleigh also said he was Madan's general attorney and not a specialist in zoning codes.

But Robert Zoeckler, a land use lawyer and former Atlanta senior assistant city attorney, whom Ormewood Park's community group, South Atlantans for Neighborhood Development, hired to represent the community, noted Madan had already had a deferral from Sept. 1.

Lemuel Ward, the chief lawyer for the city of Atlanta, also noted Madan had more than enough time to plan in the intervening two months.

The board agreed and proceeded with the hearing.

Madan, who assembled several lots on Moreland's west side between Ormewood Avenue and Hall Street, obtained city approval to split or replat the parcels into two commercial properties.

The first tract — 1.161 acres and fronting Moreland Avenue — would be the site where the QT would be built. The second tract is 0.111 acres.

That second tract was important because city regulations bar gas stations from being constructed within 100 feet of any adjoining residential, single-family properties.

Because the proposed QT site abutted another commercial tract, the smaller 0.111 parcel, and not the homes on Ormewood Avenue directly, that 100-foot buffer rule did not apply.

But city code requires that smaller parcel to have 20 feet of side yardage because there are no intervening streets between it and the residential homes.

Ward, the city attorney, said the earlier decision to grant replatting, was wrong because it stood in violation of city codes. The city shouldn't and couldn't be forced to stand by its earlier decision because it can't violate its own laws.

All along, Ormewood Park residents, who said they did not oppose QT coming to Moreland — just not at that site — believed Madan simply wanted an end-run around the ordinance requiring the 100-foot buffer.

Zoning board members seemed to agree. The replatting, zoning board member Danita Brown said, "was created to circumvent our ordinance."

Technically, Madan has 30 days to file an appeal with Fulton County Superior Court on the zoning board's denial.

But Raleigh, his attorney, said Madan would not appeal.

He also said he did not believe getting another deferral would have made a difference in the ultimate decision.

"Not in the least," Raleigh said. "I don't believe it would have made a difference in the outcome."

As for what happens with the site now, it's not clear.

Tulsa, Okla.-based QuikTrip, planned what it calls a "Gen-3" concept for the site: a 5,700-square-foot convenience store and 14 fuel pumps.

The company, which has 120 stores in metro Atlanta, has said it wanted to be on the Moreland Avenue corridor, but it withdrew its application to build on the Madan's site, Lall said.

A company spokesman confirmed to East Atlanta Patch it withdrew the application last month.

Madan's attorney said had the deal gone through, it would have been good for neighborhood curb appeal and property values, versus what's there now.

"What you've got now is a skanky store and a ramshackle building," Raleigh said.

Related Topics: Moreland Avenue, Ormewood Park, and QuikTrip
What do you think of the zoning board of adjustment's denial? Do you agree or disagree? Tell us in the comments.

Marcia Killingsworth

5:44 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011

YAY! Thanks for the coverage, EAPatch!

Reply

Terry Roth

6:10 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011

Apparently it needs to be pointed out that Mr. Maden is the owner of the said "skanky store and ramshackle building". Geesh!!

Reply

KJG

10:56 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011

Hooray! Now we can continue having that beautiful piece of vacant land instead of something we can actually use. A win for everyone!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Péralte Paul

11:26 pm on Thursday, November 3, 2011

Madan and others who supported the QT at that location have expressed similar views, KJG.

Chris Murphy

6:32 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Madan didn't assemble that property; he bought all of it from Roe (don't remember his last name), including Roe's house. He paid $2.4 million for it around 10 years ago. Check out the County's property appraisals since the sale, it's an eye-opener. Tell the County you want the same deal Madan gets.

Hopefully, Madan has mismanaged his dealings to the extent that his bankruptcy will proceed and the land will be sold to someone with a brain.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Péralte Paul

10:40 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Thanks, Chris: I'd double-check again with the city but the paperwork I saw showed a 20-year time span. I'll circle back with you.

John Wolfinger

10:44 am on Friday, November 4, 2011

Thanx to the Ormewood and SAND folks who diligently pursued this matter to this resolution, as this has a city-wide application as well as just to your neighborhood.

John Wolfinger Virginia Highland

Reply

Donna Ellis

12:37 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

I find it incrediblely interesting that all of a sudden a gas station increases property values.

Reply

Annabeth Balance

1:56 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

I'm finding that I'm confused as to why the neighborhood is pleased to get the ruling that denies an approach which would presumably result in the new QT station and store, and which retains an admittedly ratty convenience store. I think I understand the legal rationale of the decision, but I do not understand the neighborhood feelings issue.
North Briarcliff resident

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marcia Killingsworth

11:29 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Annabeth, check out the information on the neighborhood's FB page on the issue: No QuikTrip HERE: https://www.facebook.com/noqthere
It's much more complicated than it looks at first glance.

Susy Meier

3:16 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

The gas station would have been less than 100 feet from residential properties - that lot totally backs up to our neighborhood. Add to that it is supposed to be a safe walking route for children from East Atlanta to the neighborhood charter schools. We would love to have QT nearby, but that particular location was not appropriate for many reasons. Also, if you allow random avoidance of the existing zoning laws, that opens it up city wide for similar approvals. The ratty convenience store does not have to stay, but an appropriate development within the existing zoning laws needs to be put there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Annabeth Balance

8:10 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

Thank you for the information. I knew there was a neighborhood basis.

Comment_arrow

Josh

2:20 pm on Tuesday, November 8, 2011

This whole issue has turned me against having a QT around here at all. The fact that they would deal with Madan who set up this sneaky replat and would ignore neighborhood input while at the same time falsely stating that they had not puts them in a bad light. Their only saving grace here is that they apparently decided to pull out of the deal before the whole thing fell apart.

As for the property as it is...it's "skanky" and "ramshackle" because Mr. Madan lets it be that way. Nothing is stopping him from improving the site and the structures already there. Nothing is stopping him from pursuing smart redevelopment that benefits the community and does not negatively impact traffic flow and pedestrian accessibility. His tactics thus far, however, have been underhanded and antagonistic towards the community....so I don't expect much from this site until he's no longer in possession of it.

Chris Murphy

7:24 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

Peralte, Roe owned all the properties except the one on the corner of Hall St. (where Madan illegally demolished a house) and the Liberty property. All sold in '99, the corner house about '02.

Reply

Marcia Killingsworth

9:04 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

By the way, I'd rather have a "skanky store" I know than a massive, 24/7 gas station less than 100 feet away from single family homes, its entrances on the area's "Safe Routes to School" trek. I'd much rather wait for the RIGHT development. It's SO dangerous to think that different is better. If you don't believe me, drive down Lenox Road, Buford Highway or Memorial Drive. Really, were THOSE corridors improved?

Reply

Marcia Killingsworth

9:08 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

PS - Any reason Mr. Madan doesn't respect his community - much less his own property - enough to try to make it less "skanky"??? And the neighborhood is supposed to bend over backward to accommodate - illegally -- THIS kind of property owner? Folks, this man is NOT a good neighbor. Good neighbors work with the community to ensure their plans dovetail with the neighborhoods hopes and plans.

Reply

Marcia Killingsworth

9:16 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

(I.e.: Why is are the NEIGHBORS the bad guys to so many of you, instead of the property owner who has turned that entire city block into an eyesore????)

Reply

Leave a comment